Sunday, October 28, 2012

Congress Reshuffle

Today on 28/10/2012 came out the new reshuffle of the congress.. as per this shuffle of theirs many new youngsters were shown
Going back in to the past at the time when the congress party was born and Gandhi was the president of this party.. This practical tactic was brought about at time with a perfect combination of elders leading the party and the youth to come forward and help the country in its progress because of the perfect fire in them to do something...
But the question of the youth getting into politics is a BUZZ ?
the youth has come in is good but if the youth is still channelised by those people who themselves are accused of criminal cases and corruption cases against them or those ministers who are not fully qualified what kind of a guidance and suggestion can we expect from people like those
Getting the youth in is a very good idea but promoting the corrupt people like salman khurshid and rahul gandhi.. having people like Sonia gandhi as a major part of the congress shows that all this has just been done to gather votes..not with the help of youth as like before they will work on dividing the people into various sects like religion, caste etc in order to gather votes..
By promoting the youth as the new dummy faces they will show us that they have thought of progressing but by now i am sure that mostly all of us are aware about the facts and the problems that we are having to face because of these issues... since the time of congress rule we have never become independent nor can we if we do not think for ourselves, if we do not rise up together as a unit, if we still do not raise our voice against these injustices and discrimination.... We all need to think, take a stand for the cause , rise up and raise our voice against the injustices, rise together and hold our hands so that there is no person standing alone in this fight for justice..

Observe at the politics being played by the congress men :
in the reshuffle they have elected the youth to come forward so that people think they are supporting the youth and making them come forward... but no one knows that the reality that these youth people are puppets like Dr. Singh on the other hand their own ministers are resigning because of this strange attitude of theirs...
most important Salman khurshid is being given the ministry of external affairs which indicates that their motive is not to encourage the youth and find the problem to corruption but to increase it to an extend where the middle man and underprivileged are totally crushed...
It is time that we create leaders and send them and support them so that they help our country in progressing and eliminating the parties like congress , bsp etc who have done nothing for the people except destroying them  and stepping on their rights..

And even if now we don't unite and rise then it'll take a very long time for all of us to actually see INDIA RISING...
JAI HIND

Saturday, October 27, 2012

How to wipe out Islamic terror – Subramanian Swamy


“Guru Gobind Singh showed us how just five fearless persons under spiritual guidance can transform a society. Even if half the Hindu voters are persuaded to collectively vote as Hindus, and for a party sincerely committed to a Hindu agenda, then we can forge an instrument for change. And that is the bottom line in the strategy to deter terrorism in a democratic Hindustan at this moment of truth.” – Dr. Subramanian Swamy

The terrorist blast in Mumbai on July 13, 2011, requires decisive soul-searching by the Hindus of India. Hindus cannot accept to be killed in this halal fashion, continuously bleeding every day till the nation finally collapses. Terrorism I define here as the illegal use of force to overawe the civilian population to make it do or not do an act against its will and well-being.
Islamic terrorism is India’s number one problem of national security. About this there will be no doubt after 2012. By that year, I expect a Taliban takeover in Pakistan and the Americans to flee Afghanistan. Then, Islam will confront Hinduism to “complete unfinished business”. Already the successor to Osama bin Laden as al-Qaeda leader has declared that India is the priority target for that terrorist organisation and not the USA.
Fanatic Muslims consider Hindu-dominated India “an unfinished chapter of Islamic conquests”. All other countries conquered by Islam 100% converted to Islam within two decades of the Islamic invasion. Undivided India in 1947 was 75% Hindu even after 800 years of brutal Islamic rule. That is jarring for the fanatics.
In one sense, I do not blame the Muslim fanatics for targeting Hindus. I blame Hindus who have taken their individuality permitted in Sanatan Dharma to the extreme. Millions of Hindus can assemble without state patronage for the Kumbh Mela, completely self-organised, but they all leave for home oblivious of the targeting of Hindus in Kashmir, Mau, Melvisharam and Malappuram and do not lift their little finger to help organise Hindus. If half the Hindus voted together, rising above caste and language, a genuine Hindu party would have a two-thirds majority in Parliament and the assemblies.
The first lesson to be learnt from the recent history of Islamic terrorism against India and for tackling terrorism in India is that the Hindu is the target and that Muslims of India are being programmed by a slow reactive process to become radical and thus slide into suicide against Hindus. It is to undermine the Hindu psyche and create the fear of civil war that terror attacks are organised.
Hindus must collectively respond as Hindus against the terrorist and not feel individually isolated or, worse, be complacent because he or she is not personally affected. If one Hindu dies merely because he or she was a Hindu, then a bit of every Hindu also dies. This is an essential mental attitude, a necessary part of a virat (committed) Hindu.
Guru Gobind SinghjiWe need a collective mindset as Hindus to stand against the Islamic terrorist. The Muslims of India can join us if they genuinely feel for the Hindu. That they do I will not believe unless they acknowledge with pride that though they may be Muslims, their ancestors were Hindus. If any Muslim acknowledges his or her Hindu legacy, then we Hindus can accept him or her as a part of the Brihad Hindu Samaj (greater Hindu society) which is Hindustan. India that is Bharat that is Hindustan is a nation of Hindus and others whose ancestors were Hindus. Others, who refuse to acknowledge this, or those foreigners who become Indian citizens by registration, can remain in India but should not have voting rights (which means they cannot be elected representatives).
Any policy to combat terrorism must begin with requiring each and every Hindu becoming a virat Hindu. For this, one must have a Hindu mindset that recognises that there is vyaktigat charitra (personal character) and rashtriya charitra (national character). For example, Manmohan Singh has high personal character, but by being a rubber stamp of a semi-literate Sonia Gandhi and waffling on all national issues, he has proved that he has no rashtriya charitra.
The second lesson for combating terrorism is that we must never capitulate or concede any demand, as we did in 1989 (freeing five terrorists in exchange for Mufti Mohammed Sayeed’s daughter Rubaiya) and in 1999, freeing three terrorists after the hijack of Indian Airlines flight IC-814.
The third lesson is that whatever and however small the terrorist incident, the nation must retaliate massively. For example, when the Ayodhya temple was sought to be attacked, we should have retaliated by re-building the Ram temple at the site.
According to bleeding heart liberals, terrorists are born or bred because of illiteracy, poverty, oppression, and discrimination. They argue that instead of eliminating them, the root cause of these four disabilities in society should be removed. This is rubbish. Osama bin laden was a billionaire. In the failed Times Square episode, failed terrorist Shahzad was from a highly placed family in Pakistan and had an MBA from a reputed US university.
It is also a ridiculous idea that terrorists cannot be deterred because they are irrational and willing to die. Terrorist masterminds have political goals and a method in their madness. An effective strategy to deter terrorism is to defeat those political goals and to rubbish them by counter-terrorist action.Thus, I advocate the following strategy to negate the political goals of Islamic terrorism in India.

Sunday, October 21, 2012

Is Kejriwal a politician ?

Kejriwal after leaving his tenure of being in the taxation department joined hand with the new face of media Anna Hazare who then was supported my the team of people which included mainly of Kejriwal, Kiran bedi , Manish sisodia etc.
but how many of us actually know the story or the past of kejriwal.. the reality is our government saw a hidden talent in kejriwal and started to invest in him a huge amount of money by sending him abroad to learn so that he could be a commissioner and serve the country well... but unfortunately when he was back and joined his department within 2 years he had resigned and as per the contract he could not resign before the tenure of about 3 or 5 years...
this issue became very much highlighted when mr. Kejriwal spoke against corruption with mr. hazare..
after that what happened we all know
Mr. Kejriwal joined , former member of the group India Against Corruption (IAC) soon as per the public votes took a step which many of us couldn't... we were all irritated with our current system but none of us dared to get up and clean this mud in our own house... hats off to him who actually took a strong way into the world of politics and made us believe that he will help us in cleaning this mud...
Now when we all see him coming up and with him we see can clearly see the corrupt people coming directly or indirectly into the lime light which  is a reason by which many are being caught now a days..
with all due respect to Mr. Kejriwal's effort i just felt that when he now says that "mein aam aadmi hun" meaning that i am a common man then why does he behave like a politician to us at time.. i do not mean that he doesn't meet people or greet them properly but what i actually feel is why doesn't he file a suite against all these corrupt people in the supreme court...
this action of his is what makes the people confused that weather to trust him or not..  people are now getting confused that such an honest person who left everything just to see the country progress why isn't he filing a suite against these people.. and in a democracy many people many questions and similarly various answers ?

Saturday, October 13, 2012

BILL TO KILL SECULARISM - ARINDAM CHAUDHURI


The NAC-drafted Communal Violence Bill is a recipe for unmitigated disaster. In the guise of promoting communal harmony it promotes rank communalism. In the guise of protecting minorities, it attacks Hindu rights. This Bill will strike at the very foundation of liberty and legitimise criminal misdeeds ofMuslims. It must not become law. The proposed Bill, if it becomes a Law, pre-supposes that all communal riots are started by the majority Community and the minorities cannot ever do that.

What happened in Godhra would never come to light under this law as the majority community cannot complain against the happenings while the Minorities would not commit the crime.

If this Bill becomes law, any anonymous complainant can file a police case against a Hindu for inciting communal hatred - and the police will have to register it as a non-bailable offence. The definition of'Hate Propaganda' is designed to give the Government draconian powers and curb freedom of speech. While the complainant's identity will not be disclosed, the accused is treated as guilty unless he proves lies innocence (It is just the opposite of our present basic Law' you are innocent until proved guilty).

And frankly, how does one define minorities? There are many districts and towns in India where Muslims or Christians outnumber Hindus. Who will then be blamed for communal violence and riots? If one were to suppose there are riots in two towns in Uttar Pradesh - one with a Muslim majority and one with a Hindu majority... What will the police do in both these cases? Arrest only Hindus because the Indian law will state so?"

IAC & Arvind Kejriwal

Anna Hazare. Who is this guy ? ? ? Isn't it silly asking who is Anna? You all know him. Nearly every indian knows him. A social worker, a silent fighter, a young old man fighting for welfare of Indian people. He raised a revolution, a war against goverment, just to clean the corrupt system and bring an end to the miseries of the common man. This is what you will say (almost everyone). 

But do you know the mastermind behind him? The man who actually planned all this? Who used Anna as a weapon against government? You know him, not all of you, but you still know him . . . Arvind Kejriwal. Heard of this name before? Why not, he comes on our television box. On August 16, 2011, Key members of the India Against Corruption including Kejriwal, Kiran Bedi, and Manish Sisodia were arrested four hours before the planned indefinite hunger strike by Hazare.

India Against Corruption (IAC) is a citizen's movement to demand strong anti-corruption laws. After a fast by veteran social activist Anna Hazare and widespread protests by citizens across India the Government of India constituted a 10-member Joint Committee of ministers and civil society activists to draft an effective Jan Lokpal Bill. The primary focus of IAC movement is to ensure a strong Lokpal bill. The IAC is a strictly voluntary organization and its participants are bound by the IAC code of conduct.


The mastermind behind all this (IAC, hunger strike, lokpal bill and all) was actually Arvind Kejriwal. He planned these all for getting a more transparent government.  Arvind Kejriwal, sought Telugu Desam Party chief N Chandrababu Naidu's support to the demand for bringing the Prime Minister under the ambit of theproposed anti-corruption ombudsman.

Few mysteries of our ITALIAN TERRORIST SONIA

Mystery 1: Sonia married Rajiv on 25 February, 1968 but she applied for Indian citizenship only ten years later, on 7 April, 1983.


Mystery 2: Sonia got her citizenship on 30 April, 1983, but her name made its way to the electoral as of 1 January, 1983. If any ordinary person were to proceed in the same way, he would be up for stern prosecution. Thus laws are not equal for all citizens.


Mystery 3: Mystery gets compounded. How Sonia Gandhi secured shares in two of their family concerns: Maruti Technical Services Pvt. Ltd. (in 1970 and again in 1974), and Maruti Heavy Vehicles (in 1974). The acquisition of these shares was in contravention of the very Act that Mrs Gandhi used to such diabolic effect in persecuting her political opponents, the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973.


Mystery 4: Without having any known sources of income Sonia Gandhi has become the controller of largest empires of property and patronage in Delhi.


Mystery 5: Without any elementary qualification she has been heading principal institutions in India that had been set up for research and is run entirely on grants from the Government.


Mystery 6: She continues to have complete control over governmental assets of incalculable value and has converted them into a private fief through absolute fraud.


Mystery 7: The Government resources are being misused to promote herself, her family and their political aspirations. A mere summarized look at the various schemes being run after the names of Nehru Gandhi. Please note that list is endless and schemes named after Kamla Nehru, Motilal Nehru and Sanjay Gandhi have not been included.


Mystery 8: Was this woman really sick or has been making the country sick? It is not her private affair when countrymen are paying for her treatment. Why she could not be treated in India and why Government is keeping as a state secret?


Mystery 9: The biggest mystery is why opposition parties are taking such national insult lying down?




An uneducated Italian lady is ruling the people, taking away their freedoms, dividing it, looting it to the hilt, imposing an idiot on the nation as crown prince, with her son-in-law quickly become the richest person in the world, with looted funds that can last thousands generations safely provided for by Indians with all security, but not one of the 1.2 billion poor Indians can know, nor can they dare open their mouth. All patriotic persons should voice their protest.


Hindus should not be that much tolerant to people who are tyrant and who want to rule the country by cheating. Ordinary people voted for Muslim Nehru – Gandhi family thinking they are Hindus as they adopted Gandhi word with their names. People voted for Sonia due to our feeling of sympathy that she is a Bahu who lost her husband, while she deceives wearing a Sari and Bindi and talks grand deceiving talk.


If you feed milk to a poisonous snake, it will generate more poison. Let us think and tolerate and show our grandness for those who are suffering the most in our country, not these wretched and fascist people.


Let us not have any illusion about this woman. Hindus try to be grand even when it is not our loved ones, even when it is not the one we care, but we must first put every helpless and affected millions as one of your family and then show our grandness to cheaters, tyrants and bitches.

Past And Present Of Sonia Gandhi . . .

There is officially NO Sonia Gandhi. Her real name in passport is neither Gandhi nor Sonia. Its Edvige Antonia Albina Maino. Sonia is a Russian name and not italian. However, Antonia is an italian name and her passport is Italian. Though she has married Rajiv Gandhi, she never accepted change of title officially. (recall the time of turmoil in Indian politics when Sonia Gandhi was trying to be the prime minister, but ultimately Manmohan Singh became her toy).

Stefano Eugene Maino is socially the father of Sonia. Her father was a German (hitlers army). When Hitlers army went to russia they were captured and imprisoned. He was captured near St. Petersburgh and was imprisoned for 20 years. But he became a member of KGB and his imprisonment was limited to 4 years. When he came back from prison he gave russian name to his daughters. Social father because when she was born her father was in jail for 4 years. Biological father is unconfirmed.Birthplace: Sonia claims she was born in Besano, near Turin in Italy. However, as per her birth certificate, She is actually born is Luciana, in the borders of Switzerland. A resort town for German soldiers during war.


he initially put forward to Indian Govt. that she studied inCambridge University which proved to be fake. She submitted anaffidavit that she studied English in Bell Education trust at Cambridge. Even this was proven to be fake and was found she never got any education after class five. She was a young girl with no formal education living five years in England.
Citizenship: She has not given off her Italian citizenship. 

Indira Gandhi used her power to issue her an Indian Citizenship so that she can join Indian politics. She is holding an illegal citizenship in India. No action is being taken by Home Minister.
Bank Balance: Rajiv Gandhi and his family owned 2 billion USD inSwiss Bank as on November,1991. Beneficiary of death of Indira Gandhi and Rajiv Gandhi was Sonia Gandhi.

Sonia's sister Alexandria (or Anuska) has 2 shops in Italy selling antiques stolen from India. Sonia used her power to smuggle Indian artifacts through Air India flights un-inspected. Sonia's son Rahul Gandhi, whose real name is Raul Vinci. He got admitted to Harvard in quota but was thrown off soon because he was incompetent. He has italian citizenship since his mother never gave up her citizenship. He cannot officially become the citizen of India or any politician in india as long as he doesnt give up hisitalian citizenship. Arrested in Boston airport for carrying 160,000 dollars cash, accompanied by Veronique (Spanish). veronique is the daughter of Drug mafia leader. Rahul has also been accused for gang raping Sukanya Devi, whose petition to all courts in India have been rejected due to their political hold and the whereabouts of the family is unknown. However, the information is widely available online. Sonia rules only through dynastic right, sans responsibility.

Arun Shourie has effectively ripped the mask off Sonia Gandhi, who became an Indian simply by entering Indira Gandhi's house after her marriage to Rajiv Gandhi. How she has laid control over the Government of India as UPA Chairperson is a story wrapped in mysteries to shame the Indian public.
Rajiv Gandhi actually Rajiv Khan, being the son of Firoz Jehangir and Indira Priyadarshani. Gandhi is an assumed title to sentimentally lure Indians for their political benefit.

robert vadra

The biggest attack ever made public was the attack indirectly on sonia gandhi.
when one fine day arvind kejriwal exposes the biggest scam of the properties of vadra pulling the veins of the dlf who have been granted a lot political support. this political support was nothing but a way how our politicians hide their black money. there are many vadra's today who have the history all these corrupt politicians like badal, sonia , chautala , sheila dixit etc.
but lets give this case a serious thought :
TATAs took 100 years to become billionaire, Ambanis took 50 years(after utilizing all its resources), where as Robert Vadra took less than 10 years to become fastest multi billionaire.

All newspapers are scared to discuss the story of Robert Vadra because of severe threat from Sonia Gandhi and Congress government.
After Robert Vadra got married with Priyanka Gandhi, Robert's father committed suicide under mysterious circumstances, his brother found dead in his delhi residence and his sister found dead in mysterious car accident. These reports were not published in any Indian media.
He is having stakes in Malls in premier locations of India, he is having stakes in DLF IPL, and DLF itself. He was involved in CWG corruption - DLF was responsible for development of commonwealth games, and Kalmadi gave favoritism to DLF because of Robert Vadra's direct interest and business partnership with DLF.
Robert Vadra owns many Hilton Hotels including Hilton Gardens New Delhi.
Robert Vadra's association with Kolkata Knight Ryders has never been reported by Indian media.
He has 20% ownership in Unitech, Biggest beneficiary ownership of 2G Scam. Because of Robert's involvement in this scam, there are concerns that investigation would never reach decisive conclusion.
He owns prime property in India specially commercial hubs, and taxi business but for Air Taxi. He owns few private planes as well.
He has direct link with Italian businessman Quattrochi  Ottavio Quattrocchi is an Italian businessman who was being sought until early 2009 in India for criminal charges for acting as a conduit for bribes in the Bofors scandal.

It is very clear that even if anyone of us has a business empire of 50 lac then turning it into an empire of crores isnt definitely possible without the hand of a politician or if ur parents or relatives left some loads of lands in ur name which isnt possible here.
i somehow feel that the death of his father and brother was the first hint to their connections with the italian terrorist SONIA GANDHi
this uneducated terrorist who is ruling our country is very risky for the country as she is the real one behind all scams and blasts in india. The maximum amount of black money is only with her and her family . since the time of nehru's rule all they have been doing is just fooling the country .
she has mumed all the channels and this is why many cases on her and rahul gandhi never come into the eyes of the public or sometimes even on internet. this is also why when we google their education the old faked degrees only pop up. people like Dr. Swamy , rajat dixit who have been trying to expose her have never been given weightage by the media because they are scared and know that once when a media man tried to open his voice was vanished the next day and since then there has been no clues..

salman khurshid

Salman Khurshid our law minister from the same old party congress. He is well known for establishing the increase in the chains of the delhi public schools in India.He started his political career as an Officer on Special Duty in the Prime Minister's Office, during the Prime Ministership of Mrs. Indira Gandhi in the early 1980s.Later he became the Deputy Minister of Commerce in the Government of India, and then Minister of State for External Affairs in the Government of India from 1991-1996. During this period he was the Member of Parliament. In the Cabinet reshuffle of 12 July 2011, he was made Cabinet Minister for Law and Justice, and Minority Affairs in the Government of India.He has been the President of the Uttar Pradesh Pradesh Congress Committee twice.
He was also the President of the Delhi Public School Society and Dr. Zakir Hussain Study Circle.

The NGO Centre for Public Interest Litigation (CPIL) on January, 2012 filed an application before the Supreme Court alleging that the CBI and the Enforcement Directorate (ED) were going soft on Essar Group and its promoters by not charging them under Prevention of Corruption Act (PCA) in connection with 2G scam Hearing. Advocate Prashant Bhushan alleged that not charging the accused under the Prevention of Corruption Act and ignoring the findings of the Investigating Officers is unwarranted. This move had been “facilitated” by the intervention of the CBI Director and Union Law Minister Salman Khurshid, who was trying to “influence” the probe against Essar. “The interference of an influential minister in the government, the Law Minister Mr Salman Khurshid, is evident. He is publicly giving clean chit to Essar/Loop,” Bhushan said.
Salman Khurshid's public utterances and official letters (dated 24 December 2010) that allegedly give a clean chit to the Essar and Reliance (Anil Ambani) Groups for cross-holdings in Loop Telecom and Swan Telecom respectively. Under telecom rules, an existing operator like Reliance Communications (RCom) cannot hold 10 percent or more in another telecom company in the same circle. RCom has contested this allegation. The affidavit filed by CPIL says that Khurshid’s opinion “was sent even after the Comptroller and Auditor General had (raised) serious doubts over Reliance’s effective control over Swan, the unequivocal complaint of Arun Agarwal (a lawyer who first showed how Swan could be a front for Reliance) and the order dated 16 December 2010 of the apex court directing a court-monitored investigation”.
The Zakir Hussain Memorial Trust, an NGO headed by Mr. Salman Khurshid, has been accused by a TV channel of Rs 71.5 lakh scam. The trust allegedly siphoned off Rs 71.5 lakhs using forged signatures. The money was meant for distributing tricycles and hearing aids to the disabled.

it is shocking when we see the same person's wife held in the ngo scam but the point here arises that till now why were they actually sleeping. we all know that in INDIA funds are raised for handicapped and underprivileged people , money is spent in buying things worth crores of rupees but ministers like these while buying take some commission and then after buying do not distribute it but rather sell them away showing in the papers that charity has been done.
today i am not just talking about this 1 scam that has been found but those many other scams that are still hidden , we know but we can't help it..
every day the common man goes through various problems and still never gets the courage to go and take some strict actions against these fools because we know that all of them are mostly the same and the question will come on our families.
in order to safe guard ourselves we stay quite but even our police does the same they prefer to be bribed and our ministers prefer to cooperate because each and everyone is carrying the other persons vein and once one is exposed slowly many veins start to be pressed. i hope that soon all these veins are actually cut so that we can fulfill our dream to actually see a rising INDIA.

Saturday, October 6, 2012

Partition of India

We all know that India was partitioned in 1947 and while some would call it "The Year of the Lion", the others would call it "The Year of the Rat". It affected hundreds of millions of human lives. But since then very little thought has been given to the reasons, the circumstances and the consequences of Partition for all the people of the sub continent ever since.

World War 2 had been a bitter struggle for life and death of the United Kingdom, India's imperialist masters at the time and their Indian colony was assured of independence as a reward for their support to defeat the AXIS Powers (Germany, Italy and Japan). Not all the political parties in India supported the war effort. All India Congress Party under the leadership of Mr. MK ("Mahatma") Gandhi and Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru were conspicuously opposed to the continuing British rule over India and had become an obstacle. There had been widespread civil disobedience across the country, particularly in Maharashtra, UP and Bihar. However, All India Muslim League, the party claiming to speak for all the Indian Muslims remained neutral.

With long memory and a spirit of vengeance the British decided to leave India but only after partitioning it between the Muslims and the Hindus. However, since All India Congress Party continued to insist on speaking on behalf of all the Indians, including the Muslims, the term "Hindus" became "The Rest".

By this insistence of All-India Congress Party, the Muslims were rewarded with FIVE provinces of India while the Hindus ended up with nothing. Hindu religion was not enshrined in her Constitution as the State Religion. India still remained under Congress Party that was committed to the rights of the Muslims as much as to the rights of the Hindus. In this equation, the unfortunate Hindus became twice losers.

Islamic Pakistan set about total ethnic cleansing of the non Muslim minorities while the Rest of India became secular and protective of Muslim life, property, constitutional rights and safeguards. It is this fact that has continuously soured relations between the two communities in PI (Partitioned India).

Since Congress Party were in absolute control of PI, they could simply brainwash their subjects into forgetting Partition and, instead, to look at the achievements of its own leaders in driving the British out of India. The subservient "Indian coolie" media continued to champion the new ideology of make-believe world in which a fragment of India is still called "India", SOUTH Kashmir is still known as "Kashmir" and the small fragment of the original grand province of The Punjab is still known as "Punjab". The people of India really swallowed the Congress bait "hook, line and sinker".

Pandit Nehru, aware of his High Treason, set about playing the tunes of "Hindu-Muslim Bhai Bhai", Secularism, adoration of Gandhi and his Ahimsa Parmo Dharma, lulling the people into accepting his Dynasty as the legitimate and rightful rulers of India for ever. Thus he could successfully prevent any inquisitive patriotic eyes from probing into his treacherous role at Partition.

In due course of time Nehru Dynasty acquired so much power over the people of India that more of them saw their salvation in worshipping Nehru and his politically convenient mentor Gandhi, rather than questioning his role at Partition or his secularism and morality. The Gandhis, as the Nehru Dynasty came to be known to further mislead and fool the people as to their real genealogy and ideology, had a paranoia about freedom of speech. They controlled the media, particularly Broadcasting, that is crucial in an
illiterate country like India, and closely watched any journalist and editor "stepping beyond the line". They put their foot down on 1947 and all what happened to the ordinary people of India in that year.

Whatever was to smear their fair name in the world, was ruthlessly ELIMINATED or CRUSHED. Some dare devil democrats and champions of freedom of speech were severely punished during the Emergency declared by Pandit Nehru's daughter in 1975. It was a hammering that was to keep the nation's HEAD DOWN for another quarter of a century.

There were two unfortunate consequences of this Suppression of Truth about Partition. Firstly, the guilty were never punished and secondly no official report was commissioned on PARTITION to list the losses- both HUMAN and MATERIAL, or record the political consequences like the wars over Kashmir. Nothing was put down in the Constitution enacted under Nehru's close scrutiny on 26 January 1950 about reunification of the country. The questions, "What direction will India, Pakistan and Bangladesh be going?" and, "What will be the consequences of that for peace in all parts of former India?" have never been answered.

As a result of this extreme suspicion of 'people power', the two new States bore the brunt of brutality. It meant that Nehru Dynasty were beyond Law and NO enquiry could be conducted about their treason and corruption at and after Partition. No one could question their vast wealth in the shape of bank accounts and properties in India and abroad, and the various "foundations" that siphon off nation's savings in a big but unseen way. SOUTH Kashmir and EAST Punjab have remained afflicted with militancy that has held life to ransom. Both States are related in an ironic way, being the illegitimate product of Partition.

Myth of Godhra


Since no 'secularist' or 'liberal' or 'objective' person ever challenged the above sets of figures, some questions arise: Who killed 200-odd Hindus so early in those riots? Was it the police or the Hindus themselves? And what made those 40,000 Hindus rush to relief camps? Was it fear of Hindu mob violence, rape, arson and murder?
Two recent 'news briefs' in print are critical evidence of a reality that's been totally ignored by our 'liberals' who have, for four years running, gone on and on and on about the 'genocide' of Muslims in Gujarat after the sudden inferno in the S-6 compartment of Sabarmati Express had consumed 58 Hindus, including 26 women and 12 children, returning home after performing kar seva at Ayodhya.

In its edition of March 19, 2006, The Sunday Express carried the following report from Ahmedabad:

"Post-Godhra riot case: 7 get lifer
The city sessions court on Friday convicted seven people in a post-Godhra riot case and sentenced them to life term for the murder of 35-year-old Mukesh Panchal, a resident of Lambha. He was attacked by the accused and went missing on November 7, 2003 from Shah-e-Alam Darwaza. His mutilated body was found near Chandoka Lake on November 11. One of the seven accused—Javed Shaukat Ali—meanwhile managed to give the cops a slip and fled from the court."

In its edition of Wednesday, March 29, 2006 The Indian Express carried the following report, also datelined Ahmedabad:

"Nine get jail in post-Godhra riot case
The city sessions court on Tuesday convicted nine accused in a post-Godhra riot case. Additional Sessions Judge Sonia Gokani sentenced Mushtaq alias Kanio Ahmed Sheikh to 10 years in jail for murder and attempt to murder. Eight others were sentenced to 18 months in prison for unlawful assembly, possessing weapons and rioting."

Out of the five convictions so far in l'affaire Godhra, the above two rip the blindfold on Godhra that the country was subjected to since March 2002. Those two convictions conclusively prove that even as some Hindus in Vadodra, Ahmedabad and a few other parts of Gujarat were provoked into insane killing, arson and loot by the S-6 carnage, the Muslims in that state were hardly the cattle hiding from the slaughter house that they have been made out by the "secularists" in and outside our national English media. Do you, for instance, recall reading about the mutilation of Mukesh Panchal's cadaver in any of the English print media? Did you hear a sound byte about it on our TV?

Yes, despite all the media and the consequent political, propaganda about the 'genocide' of Gujarat's Muslims, the reality is that some of that community were also engaged in murder, rioting and unlawful assembly with arms in hand.

This trend was discernible to the objective person four years ago itself. Thus, in its issue of April 28, 2002, The Times of India reporter, Sanjay Pandey, told us that of the 726 people who had been killed by then in the post-Godhra riots, 168 were Hindus. In its issue of June 24, 2002, India Today carried an article saying that the official figure of all people killed in Gujarat in the three months following the S-6 massacre was 800, of which a quarter were Hindus. The Union Home Ministry's Annual Report 2002-03 said that about a third of the total dead in the Godhra riots were Hindus. It also said that, at one stage, 40,000 Hindus were in riot relief camps.

Since no 'secularist' or 'liberal' or 'objective' person ever challenged the above sets of figures, some questions arise: Who killed 200-odd Hindus so early in those riots? Was it the police or the Hindus themselves? And what made those 40,000 Hindus rush to relief camps? Was it fear of Hindu mob violence, rape, arson and murder?

More proof of the blindfold on Godhra came in 2005, when the UPA coalition (comprising the 'secular' friends of Muslims) made a statement in Parliament that 254 Hindus and 790 Muslims were killed in those riots.

But our national media simply refused to remove the blindfold on Godhra. Hence it was that the elites of our society continued to rant about the Gujarat 'pogrom of genocide'; some cussed Indians even conspired to deny a US visa to the Chief Minister of one of the country's fastest developing states.

Aiding and abetting that conspiracy were reports from Human Rights Watch, Amnesty International et al. The National Human Rights Commission joined in; written lies by the likes of Arundhati Roy and fake e-mails added fuel to the fire. All of them went to town about the Gujarat 'genocide' with blinkers on, a blindfold underneath. None wanted to touch upon the minority community's role in that tragedy.

But the latest criminal conviction of 16 Muslims evokes the recall of the Justice Tewatia Report on the Godhra issue published on April 26, 2002 under the aegis of the Council For International Affairs And Human Rights, based in New Delhi.

It was a report based on a six-day field study of a team headed by Justice D.S. Tewatia, former Chief Justice, Calcutta High Court and Punjab and Haryana High Court. Its other members were Dr J.C. Batra, senior advocate, Supreme Court, Dr Krishan Singh, academician, Jawahar Lal Kaul, veteran journalist, and Prof. B. K. Kuthiala, Dean, Faculty of Media Studies, G.J. University, Hisar.

The five-man team visited three affected areas and relief camps in Ahmedabad, interacting freely with the public and members of both communities, and without government interference. In Godhra, five delegations from both communities and also of mixed composition presented their views and facts to the team. Similarly, free discussions with the public and affected communities were held in Vadodra at seven affected areas and five relief camps. It collected information from the staff at the Godhra Railway Station, district administration, including the Collector and Police Commissioner, passengers traveling in Sabarmati Express on 27.02.02 in S-6 compartment as well as in other compartments, staff of the Fire Brigade, Godhra, reports in 22 newspapers and nine magazines (local, regional and Delhi) and views on media coverage articulated by some 500 persons including intellectuals like lawyers, doctors and businessmen. The site where the train was initially stopped and stoned was also visited. A high point was that 13 delegations consisting of 121 citizens met Justice Tewatia's team and presented their viewpoints and information. The delegations ranged from the Association of Hoteliers to a group of Vanvasis and affected Muslim as well as Hindu women.

Based on the considerable oral, audio and visual evidence obtained from the above interactions, the Justice Tewatia team's conclusions most relevant to the blindfold on Godhra were as follows:
  1. Burning of 58 Hindu pilgrims on February 27, 2002 was an act carried out at the behest of then government of Pakistan which had planned to burn the entire Sabarmati Express carrying some 2000 passengers. The primary objective was to create Hindu-Muslim communal conflagration in India. The actual perpetrators were jehadi elements in the predominantly Muslim town of Godhra where
    1. a very high traffic of telephone calls was recorded between Godhra and Pakistan, especially Karachi, before the date of the carnage
    2. an abnormally large number of passports were issued,
    3. there was a large number of persons without ration cards
    4. a large number of unemployed Muslims had mobile phones,
    5. though there is no tradition of being a Muslim pilgrim center and the local Muslims are not affluent, three istema (religious gatherings) have been held and attended by large numbers of foreigners, and
    6. an Assistant Collector (a young Muslim from eastern UP) went on leave two days before the gory incident and did not return till the middle of March though the district of his posting was aflame with communal riots much earlier.
  2. The vacuum pipe between the Coaches No. S-6 and S-7 was cut thereby preventing any further movement of the train. Miscreants threw bricks and stones at the train as soon as it left Godhra railway station. The stoning intensified after it finally stopped about 700 metres from the station. The passengers of the train, particularly Coaches S-5, S-6 and S-7, were the main targets. Burning missiles and acid bulbs were thrown on and in the coaches. One such acid missile landed in Coach S-7 and a fire started which the passengers were able to extinguish. But the attack continued and more burning missiles were thrown into the Coach S-6.
  3. In an effort to control the subsequent riots, the Gujarat government
  4. Publicly announced its decision to employ the Army on the evening of the day riots began on February 28 (Within less than 24 hours at least one brigade of Indian Army had air-landed at Ahmedabad),
  5. Made preventive arrests of over 33,000 people,
  6. Fired over 12,000 rounds of bullets,
  7. Fired over 15,000 rounds of tear gas shells,
  8. The involvement of Vanvasis in the post-Godhra riots added a new dimension to the communal violence. In rural areas the Vanvasis attacked the Muslim moneylenders, shopkeepers and the forest contractors. They used their traditional bow and arrows as also their implements used to cut trees and grass while attacking Muslims. They moved in groups and used coded signals for communication. Apparently, the accumulated anger of years of exploitation by Muslim moneylenders (interest of 50 per cent per annum), shopkeepers and forest contractors had become explosive after moneylenders sexually exploited their womenfolk.
  9. The media selected, distorted and added fiction to prove their respective points of view. The code of ethics prescribed by the Press Council of India was violated by the media with impunity. It so enraged the citizens that several concerned citizens in the disturbed areas suggested that peace could return to the state only if some of the TV channels were closed for some weeks. Even the Vanvasis complained that the media had no time to hear their agony and was spreading canards against the Hindus. Newspapers published in English from Delhi invariably editorialised the news. Direct and indirect comments in the news writing were so telling that the personal likes and dislikes of the news reporters were too obvious to be missed. They appeared to have assumed the role of crusaders against the State Government from day one. It coloured the entire operation of newsgathering, feature writing and editorials.
Conclusions 1 to 4 above are indicators as to why our national media, ever afraid to criticise the Muslim and ever ready to indulge in BJP/Hindu bashing, bypassed the Justice Tewatia Report, despite its high credentials and the fact that it was publicly released at a press conference in New Delhi. After all, our 'secular' national media simply could not have tolerated giving even a line to report's conclusion 5 above. Hence, they simply buried the whole report itself, put a blindfold on the country vision of it. After all, they had found their Hindu-bashing agenda in the post-Godhra riots and they were hell-bent in pushing it full steam, right up to the Supreme Court and beyond to the United Nations.