Suspetion in Patna Blasts is it just the IM or the JD(U) & Congress ?

The lowest level of politics is clearly depicted here in the exclusive stories by victims of the blast... SHAME ON THE JD(U) & Congress for letting it happen... TODAY THE LIFE OF A COMMAN MAN IS SO CHEAP THAT ONLY AT TIME OF VOTE THEY BEG O...THEr TIME THEY STEAL.... Its Time that we all got together and changed this entire system ....

Some statements make u think nitish was guilty and he purposely took no action :
1. Amit Sadar, a rally supporter, was injured not in the blast, but in stone throwing. “The bomb I saw was of metal. It caused a lot of chaos. People were running helter-skelter. They were throwing bricks, because the police were not doing anything,”
2. “We then went inside to help our people. We saw one bomb which was fixed with a watch and one more gadget. Around 12.30 p.m. it went off. The blast was huge. My head just stopped working,” Mr. Singh said. Many victims said the people alerted the police when they spotted the explosive devices, but the police took no step whatsoever to move people to safety.
3. “For 10 minutes we were screaming for help. After hearing about the railway station blast, we were considering whether to stay at the rally venue or make a move,” Upendra Rai, whose friend was badly injured, said with tears in his eyes.
4. “I fell unconscious for a while when the blast took place. When I regained consciousness, I started screaming, bomb phata [bomb has exploded]! Had I anticipated any danger I would never have come for this rally. I am not going to attend any more rallies.
5. “If he did not want this rally, he should have just stopped it. This is a conspiracy by the Chief Minister,” Mukesh Singh said.
6. it isthe government’s conspiracy. Mr. Kumar wants to take revenge on the people,” Mr. Mishra, an injured BJP worker, alleged.
7. “People tried to defuse the bombs by throwing stones at them,” said Brijesh Kumar Mishra, who also suffered injuries.

Our duties towards idiotic baba's on media

Our Duties:
1. Never underestimate yourself
2. u have the answer to all ur problems all u need is to evaluate or a help of a true friend or guide
3. never rely on what any external person says
4. refrain from being easily influenced by baba marketing schemes
5. don't waste ur hard earned money donating here but rather give it to old age homes and orphanage's
6. check and recheck whatever is told by u to be done and judge practically
7. don't mix coincidence with the saying of a dhongi like radha maa and nirmal baba
8. never ever go alone to such places to meet such people for guidance or blessings councillors are better
9. educate the people around u and tell the media to stop popularising them
10. don't sell urself for such ppl and money that u fake things for them and destroy other people life and hard earned income
11. check the income source and expenditures being done and ask y do u have to pay to listen to them if they are doing charity and getting donation
12. if they have temples ask them y is no education being imparted for free in every centre of theirs
13. ask them y do they travel in business class seats in planes and big luxury cars and who and why did someone give the this amount and for what
14 observe every action carefully
15. always stay alert

 

A little tit bits on Pak attacks...

Its the question of our own dignity and pride...
Not Only is the current attack on us being condemned but every attack from Pak on our pride our own INDIAN JAWANS is being condemned today. Have we ever wondered that a country like India that has the power to take down the entire country of pak why is it being belittled every time . Well on my research on the web I got a few answers to it which are... :-
1)The IsI has information of people with black money and many of politicians and big businessmen are involved in this scam
2)The politicians are playing a very diplomatic game with the nations the fight today is no longer a nuclear fight but a political fight for land and when a small country can control the entire world politics making U.S envy Iran then y should we lack behind in this race of minds
3)We are afraid to loose as Pak is being backed heavily by China, (For those who are unaware china is a country that is not a democratic nation and which is y it wants all the other nation around it to be the same this is also the reason of fight between nations around the china sea like japan) China has decided to grab A.P and as per its map A.P is a part of china, so is C.O.K and Tibet and the fight for grabbing more and more land from India is on because it knows that India wont ever retaliate and it is easy to press such nations that cant speak for its own so it indirectly funds Pak to do this
4)The Phonetics of Pak do not want what the people of Pak want that is to again make an undivided BHARAT and not 2 nations but the organisations dominate Afghan and Pak to such an extent that not only the peace treaties but also the other treaties have become a matter of loss for us
5)Pak is a fake democracy as it is actually made to offend India and if it makes peace its existence is a waste moreover the pak as a nation is governed by the commando general and not the real voice of people what we see isn't the reality in case of pak and its so called freedom...

 Solution as per me :
We must forget all our political barriers get together and respond back to the PAK in order to shut them up , we can not afford another mistake like POK in our life all over again ever

See More

Overturning discussion leads to corruption...

After three days of the FIR getting filed against ex Coal Secretary PC Parakh, noted industrialist Kumar Mangalam Birla and his company Hindalco, I still cannot understand what the grounds for this FIR are. It appears that the fact that Parakh overturned the screening committee decision on allotment of a mine to Hindalco is the basis of this FIR. This is bizarre for several reasons.
Firstly, if the Coal Secretary is legally authorized to overturn the decision of the screening committee, then why is that provision there at all, if not to be exercised at times? If the screening committee was the final authority, then no matter what Parakh or the PM wanted to do, they could not have overturned it. The reality is that the final authority is the Coal Secretary and the Coal Minister, who are deemed to be more competent than the screening committee. In that case, one may wonder, why have the screening committee at all? The answer of course, is that such overturning decisions are rare, and made usually when the authority feels the screening committee has erred, as in this case.
Secondly, if the Coal Secretary did not overturn a decision even when he was convinced it was a wrong decision, then what kind of an authority is he? He would be better called a clerk. If we had to have a government of clerks, then why even have such a celebrated cadre as the IAS in place?
Thirdly, to establish any criminal case of corruption, there must be someone charged with giving money and someone with receiving. Who are those people here? Is the CBI saying that Birla and Hindalco paid a bribe? And Parakh and the PM received it? Then surely the CBI can show us some money trail? If the money trail isn’t there, then what kind of a charge is this? Then the “Why was the decision overturned?” question would become merely a case of administrative decision making, and not corruption. Sure, the authorities would have to reply to the public about why the decision was overturned, but the CBI would have no case at all.
So why did Parakh overturn the screening committee decision? I think the mid 2000s was a period of when the government was hell bent on achieving a high growth in investments. The government was pushing all segments of the industry to invest, build capacity and increase production. This would lead to job creation, alleviation of poverty, distribution of wealth, social equity etc. It is such policies that led to the fastest growth India has seen since independence. It is such policies that brought alive the India story in the first place. Had India continued to grow at the BJP growth rate of the previous six years, it would never have attracted the kind of foreign investments it did since 2004. Likewise, the reason the number of coal mines allotted was so much higher than during the UPA period was the same – there was much more investment-spurred demand for coal.
The answer to Parakh’s action is very clear. But before I come to that, it’s worth mentioning that it was probably the same reason that made Naveen Patnaik recommend that Hindalco be given a share of the mine, after the screening committee had turned it down. It’s the same reason that made the PM ratify Parakh’s decision. None of these people needs to worry; nor run away from what was clearly a legitimate decision.
The reason for the overturning was the huge capital investment that Hindalco had planned in the steel sector. As per ET dated yesterday (http://tinyurl.com/42bjvkk ) “A coal ministry official said Hindalco has invested as much as Rs 17,000 crore in the attached 900-mw captive power plant, a 1.5 million tonnes aluminium refinery and a 3.5 lakh tonne smelter in Odisha”. What’s wrong if a mine was provided under extant policies to Hindalco to facilitate this investment? Maybe the question one should ask is why the screening committee took the wrong decision. Why did it favor the government’s own companies, when there is no such provision under any law. PC Parakh himself said this in The Mint dated October 16^th (http://tinyurl.com/n5cgk6z ) “We decided in favour of Neyveli Lignite because it was a government company; it was also my own ministry’s company, so we have considered Neyveli (over) Hindalco”. That’s hardly a fair reason to allot a mine to Neyveli.
Also, the overturning was not as if Neyveli was thrown out. All that it amounted to was allotting Hindalco a 15% share in the mine. If corruption was the reason for the decision, what stopped Parakh and the PM from allotting 100% to Hindalco? Or 75% or 50%? Why only 15%? The answer is obvious: the 15% was sufficient to take care of the requirements of the attached power/aluminium plant. It was a specific allocation for a specific project.

So we have no money trail. No grounds not to believe the overturning decision. And yet, what does the CBI do? It files an FIR alleging corruption. How do they even do this? Of course the SC will have to be convinced. And of course, the SC will ask the same questions. Chances are that if this is all that the CBI has got, then the case will be thrown out. But even though so many cases get thrown out, it takes so long that the reputation of the accused gets sullied for good. Would the CBI have anything to say then? Our media will certainly not given any weightage to the acquittal. It would help if the SC expedited its own working, and brought a closure to such silly cases quickly.
The real truth is what I have written twice in the last three days. The CBI has shot itself in the foot and in fact, justified why it should remain caged. The institutions – CBI, CAG, SC – have all failed us at different points in time. If this continues, we should be prepared to see an exodus of our biggest businessmen (ever wondered how difficult it is for Ambani/Tata/Mittal/Birla to shift base to a Singapore or HK or London or NY?). And for India to return to the Hindu rate of growth of 3% per annum…..

Article 370

Article 370 of the Indian Constitution, which is of a temporary nature, grants special status to Jammu and Kashmir. Under Part XXI of the Constitution of India, which deals with “Temporary, Transitional and Special provisions”, the State of Jammu and Kashmir has been accorded special status under Article 370. Interestingly, till 1965, J&K had a Sadr-e-Riyasat for Governor and Prime Minister in place of Chief Minister !

When Indian Government was merging with Indian Princely States and foreign ruled territories using Instrument of Accession, J&K chose to remain independent, but when Muslim Tribes (allegedly supported by the government of Pakistan) attacked Jammu and Kashmir on 6 October 1947, to save his state Maharaja Hari Singh (the then ruler of J&K) chose to accede Jammu & Kashmir to India, so that India could help in defending her. The accession of the state to India is still a matter of dispute between India and Pakistan , and still on the agenda of the U.N.Security Council.

Why special status?
Article 370 is a special clause in Indian Constitution and was extracted in 1950  by Sheikh Mohammed Abdullah after lengthy negotiations with Indian leaders. The architect of the Indian Constitution, Dr. Ambedkar, opposed granting Article 370 but it was on India's first Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru's insistence and personal guarantee that it was granted to the state.

Personal Comments :
Article 370 was supposed to be a temporary solution but since none of the governments have raised this issue, J&K government have become more demanding. Recently, current state CM Mr. Farooq Abdullah is demanding even more autonomy. I believe that carving out special status for J&K was a "Historical Blunder". This very Article 370, I think, inhibits the progress of the state. If it had been in the purview of the Central Government completely, things would have been better. Currently, it seems to me that Kashmir is an orphan territory to be occupied by whosoever carries a gun.